Clarke v. 158 St. & Riverside Drive Housing Co.

245 A.D.2d 208, 665 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13324

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered September 30, 1996, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly granted in favor of defendant, an out-of-possession landlord having only a general right of reentry, where defendant established that neither structural failure nor specific statutory violation was involved (see, Raynor v 666 Fifth Ave. Ltd. Partnership, 232 AD2d 226). Plaintiff failed to produce evidence that defendant had notice of the defect or had entered into a covenant to be responsible therefor [209] (see, Hernandez v Neubert Realty Corp., 169 AD2d 645, 646). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarke v. 158 St. & Riverside Drive Housing Co., 245 A.D.2d 208, 665 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 208 (Clarke v. 158 St. & Riverside Drive Housing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez v. Neubert Realty Corp.
169 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Raynor v. 666 Fifth Avenue Ltd. Partnership
232 A.D.2d 226 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)