Clarke-Emerson Manufacturing Co. v. Regal Shoe Co.
28 F.2d 1008, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2525
This text of 28 F.2d 1008 (Clarke-Emerson Manufacturing Co. v. Regal Shoe Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clarke-Emerson Manufacturing Co. v. Regal Shoe Co., 28 F.2d 1008, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2525 (1st Cir. 1928).
Opinion
The only question raised by this appeal is whether the patentee was the inventor of the device, the subject-matter of the patent in suit. In the District Court it was found that he was, and we are of the opinion that the finding should not be disturbed.
The decree of. the District Court is affirmed, with costs to the appeEee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 F.2d 1008, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-emerson-manufacturing-co-v-regal-shoe-co-ca1-1928.