Clarke & Eaton Co. v. Warden Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Clarke & Eaton Co. v. Warden Investment Co.

160 P. 1199, 93 Wash. 699, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1213

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 13, 1916

DocketNo. 13348

StatusPublished

This text of 160 P. 1199 (Clarke & Eaton Co. v. Warden Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clarke & Eaton Co. v. Warden Investment Co., 160 P. 1199, 93 Wash. 699, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1213 (Wash. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question in this case is whether a payment of interest amounting to $1,466.64, made upon a note secured by a real estate mortgage, should be credited upon a note executed by the defendant and held by the plaintiff. The trial court, upon the issues of the case, found that a settlement and stated account was had by the parties, and that the defendant had assumed this payment in addition to the note held by the plaintiff. The evidence plainly sustains this finding. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The question in this case is whether a payment of interest amounting to $1,466.64, made upon a note secured by a real estate mortgage, should be credited upon a note executed by the defendant and held by the plaintiff. The trial court, upon the issues of the case, found that a settlement and stated account was had by the parties, and that the defendant had assumed this payment in addition to the note held by the plaintiff. The evidence plainly sustains this finding. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 P. 1199, 93 Wash. 699, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-eaton-co-v-warden-investment-co-wash-1916.