Clark v. Yates
This text of 24 Ky. 194 (Clark v. Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The defendants in error filed their hill in chancery, as heirs of William Clark deceased, agaist the plaintiffs in error, also, heirs of said Clark, to set aside a will, purporting to be the last testament of their ancestor, and which had been admitted to record in the county court of Adair.
Pascal D. Craddock, who was qualified as the executorofthe will, was prayed tobe made a defendant; but process was never served on him, and he did not enter his appearance.
The court decreed in favor of the defendants in error, and declared the will invalid, for want of a disposing mind by the testator.
The decree was premature and irregular. The executor was a necessary party. He was not made a party, and consequently the decree, for this cause is erroneous.
Wherefore the decree is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions for such further proceedings; as may be necessary to prepare the case for final and valid decree, and as the executor has appeared in this court, it will be unnecessary to serve him with process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Ky. 194, 1 J.J. Marsh. 194, 1829 Ky. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-yates-kyctapp-1829.