Clark v. Wright

93 S.E. 498, 20 Ga. App. 827, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1112
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 13, 1917
Docket8915
StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 498 (Clark v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Wright, 93 S.E. 498, 20 Ga. App. 827, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1112 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

George, J.

This case is here on a direct bill of exceptions in which error is assigned on the refusal of the court to allow an amendmént, and on' the refusal to admit in evidence a judgment of the court of ordinary-setting apart a year’s support to the widow, and a written agreement between the widow and the temporary administrator. The amendment was not sworn to, and every question presented by the bill of exceptions ■ was fully disposed of adversely to the contentions of plaintiff in error by the decision of the Supreme Court in this ease. Wright v. Clark, 145 Ga. 534 (89 S. E. 618). There was no error in refusing the amendment, in rejecting the proffered evidence, and in directing d, verdict for' the defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Clark
89 S.E. 618 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 498, 20 Ga. App. 827, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-wright-gactapp-1917.