Clark v. Wilmington Trust Co.
This text of 105 A. 834 (Clark v. Wilmington Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Your suggestion is a very proper one. Ordinarily in an action upon a replevin bond no question can be tried which could and ought to have been tried and determined in the replevin suit. Harmon v. Collins, 2 Pennewill 36, 45 Atl. 541. Let a jury be drawn.
Testimony for the defendants was submitted to the jury and they fomid for the defendants for one hundred and thirty-eight dollars and two cents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 A. 834, 30 Del. 287, 7 Boyce 287, 1919 Del. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-wilmington-trust-co-delsuperct-1919.