Clark v. Wilmington Trust Co.
105 A. 834, 30 Del. 287, 7 Boyce 287, 1919 Del. LEXIS 26
Opinion
Your suggestion is a very proper one. Ordinarily in an action upon a replevin bond no question can be tried which could and ought to have been tried and determined in the replevin suit. Harmon v. Collins, 2 Pennewill 36, 45 Atl. 541. Let a jury be drawn.
Testimony for the defendants was submitted to the jury and they fomid for the defendants for one hundred and thirty-eight dollars and two cents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. Wilmington Trust Co., 105 A. 834, 30 Del. 287, 7 Boyce 287, 1919 Del. LEXIS 26 (Del. Ct. App. 1919).
105 A. 834 (Clark v. Wilmington Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Truitt v. Collins
45 A. 541 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1899)