Clark v. Volpe

Fifth Circuit

Clark v. Volpe

461 F.2d 1266, 2 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 10, 1972·No. No. 72-1631·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a class action in which plaintiffs seek to enjoin the construction, already in progress when suit was filed, of Interstate Highway 610 through City Park in the City of New Orleans. Suit was filed February 24, 1972, and on March 21, 1972, after an evidentiary hearing confined to the issue of laches, the court dismissed the action by application of the doctrine of laches. Its reasons for judgment are set forth in 342 F.Supp. 1324.

The decision of the District Court must be, and is, affirmed. Ragland v. Mueller, 460 F.2d 1196 [5th Cir., 1972.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is a class action in which plaintiffs seek to enjoin the construction, already in progress when suit was filed, of Interstate Highway 610 through City Park in the City of New Orleans. Suit was filed February 24, 1972, and on March 21, 1972, after an evidentiary hearing confined to the issue of laches, the court dismissed the action by application of the doctrine of laches. Its reasons for judgment are set forth in 342 F.Supp. 1324.

The decision of the District Court must be, and is, affirmed. Ragland v. Mueller, 460 F.2d 1196 [5th Cir., 1972.]

Clark v. Volpe, 461 F.2d 1266, 2 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

461 F.2d 1266 (Clark v. Volpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related