Clark v. United States
This text of 4 F.2d 382 (Clark v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The search of the automobile was not unauthorized. Stafford v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 300 F. 537; Moseley v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 4 F.(2d) 381, decided February 4, 1925.
2. The sufficiency of the evidence as against Ronaidi, and under the rule of Stafford v. U. S., supra, is challenged. The jury might well have thought it insufficient; but, considering the elements of improbability in Ronaldi’s story and conflicts between his story and that of Clark, we are not satisfied that there was error in submitting this issue to the jury.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 F.2d 382, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-united-states-ca6-1925.