Clark v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 F.3d 1066
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 24, 1997·No. 96-40858·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40858 Conference Calendar

DARRELL CLARK and SHANNA CLARK, Individually and as next friend of KENNEDI CLARK, a minor,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CV-34 - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellants argue that the district court erred in dismissing

their action under the Federal Tort Claims Act for lack of

subject-matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the

briefs on appeal and AFFIRM the district court’s order granting

the motion to dismiss for essentially the same reasons set forth

by the district court. Darrell Clark and Shanna Clark,

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-40858 - 2 -

Individually and a/n/f/ Kennedi Clark, a minor v. United States,

No. 4:96-CV-34 (E.D. Tex. July 5, 1996).

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. United States, (5th Cir. 1997).

Clark v. United States (Clark v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.