Clark v. United States
250 F. 449, 162 C.C.A. 519, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1920
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 1918
DocketNo. 3201
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases
This text of 250 F. 449 (Clark v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clark v. United States, 250 F. 449, 162 C.C.A. 519, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1920 (5th Cir. 1918).
Opinion
Plaintiff in error was convicted under the act of Congress of February 14, 1917, for the use of the following language, alleged by the indictment to have been with reference to the President:
“Wilson is a wooden-headed son of a bitch. I wish Wilson was in hell, and if I had the power I would put him there.”
A motion to quash the indictment was properly overruled. United States v. Stickrath (D. C.) 242 Fed. 151.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Ogren
52 M.J. 528 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1999)
People v. Brooks
26 Cal. App. 4th 142 (California Court of Appeal, 1994)
United States v. Mary Frances Carrier
672 F.2d 300 (Second Circuit, 1982)
Watts v. United States
394 U.S. 705 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Robert Watts v. United States
402 F.2d 676 (D.C. Circuit, 1968)
Reid v. United States
136 F.2d 476 (Fifth Circuit, 1943)
United States v. Reid
49 F. Supp. 313 (W.D. Louisiana, 1943)
Ragansky v. United States
253 F. 643 (Seventh Circuit, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
250 F. 449, 162 C.C.A. 519, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-united-states-ca5-1918.