Clark v. United States

Third Circuit

Clark v. United States

108 F.2d 969, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4164

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJanuary 3, 1940

DocketNo. 7172

StatusPublished

This text of 108 F.2d 969 (Clark v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. United States, 108 F.2d 969, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4164 (3d Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We note that the bill of exceptions in this case was neither settled nor filed within the time limited by Rule IX, Rules of Practice and Procedure in Criminal Cases, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723a, as validly extended by the trial judge to August 15, 1939. His further extension to August 25th was invalid since it was not granted within thirty days after the taking of the appeal. Long v. United States, 9 Cir., 90 F.2d 482, certiorari denied 302 U.S. 730, 58 S.Ct. 55, 82 L.Ed. 564. We have nevertheless examined the bill of exceptions in the light of appellant’s argument, but find no error therein which affected his substantial rights. See Gleckman v. United States, 8 Cir., 80 F.2d 394.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We note that the bill of exceptions in this case was neither settled nor filed within the time limited by Rule IX, Rules of Practice and Procedure in Criminal Cases, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723a, as validly extended by the trial judge to August 15, 1939. His further extension to August 25th was invalid since it was not granted within thirty days after the taking of the appeal. Long v. United States, 9 Cir., 90 F.2d 482, certiorari denied 302 U.S. 730, 58 S.Ct. 55, 82 L.Ed. 564. We have nevertheless examined the bill of exceptions in the light of appellant’s argument, but find no error therein which affected his substantial rights. See Gleckman v. United States, 8 Cir., 80 F.2d 394.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 F.2d 969, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-united-states-ca3-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack