Clark v. United Sanitation Service, Inc.

171 So. 2d 368
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 3, 1965·No. No. 33863·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 14, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. United Sanitation Service, Inc., 171 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1965).

171 So. 2d 368 (Clark v. United Sanitation Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Headley v. Selkowitz
171 So. 2d 368 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)