Clark v. Trubitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Clark v. Trubitt

33 A.D.2d 642, 305 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3061

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 642 (Clark v. Trubitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Trubitt, 33 A.D.2d 642, 305 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed as academic, with costs to appellant. Memorandum: Upon the argument of this appeal attorneys for both parties agreed that the appeal has become academic inasmuch as the respondent no longer holds the position of Commissioner of Public Safety and has left the State to return to a teaching position at the University of Indiana. We are therefore dismissing the appeal, but are awarding costs to appellant under the authority rested in us by CPLR 8107. It is apparent that at the time appellant was organizing his record on appeal respondent’s attorney, as Assistant Corporation Counsel' of the City of Utica, knew that respondent would vacate his position and depart the State before the appeal could be argued. Instead of relaying this information, to appellant’s counsel and relieving him of the necessity of printing a record, the attorney insisted that a voluminous record be printed and compelled appellant’s attorney to obtain an order from an appellate court Judge permiting him to hand up the transcript of an arbitration hearing as an exhibit in order to avoid reproducing it. In these circumstances, an award of costs to appellant is appropriate. (Benelli v. Benelli, 19 A D 2d 829.) (Appeal from order of Oneida Special Term denying motion for injunction.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal unanimously dismissed as academic, with costs to appellant. Memorandum: Upon the argument of this appeal attorneys for both parties agreed that the appeal has become academic inasmuch as the respondent no longer holds the position of Commissioner of Public Safety and has left the State to return to a teaching position at the University of Indiana. We are therefore dismissing the appeal, but are awarding costs to appellant under the authority rested in us by CPLR 8107. It is apparent that at the time appellant was organizing his record on appeal respondent’s attorney, as Assistant Corporation Counsel' of the City of Utica, knew that respondent would vacate his position and depart the State before the appeal could be argued. Instead of relaying this information, to appellant’s counsel and relieving him of the necessity of printing a record, the attorney insisted that a voluminous record be printed and compelled appellant’s attorney to obtain an order from an appellate court Judge permiting him to hand up the transcript of an arbitration hearing as an exhibit in order to avoid reproducing it. In these circumstances, an award of costs to appellant is appropriate. (Benelli v. Benelli, 19 A D 2d 829.) (Appeal from order of Oneida Special Term denying motion for injunction.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Moule, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 642, 305 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-trubitt-nyappdiv-1969.