Clark v. Tacoma Building & Savings Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court

Clark v. Tacoma Building & Savings Ass'n

26 P. 253, 2 Wash. 203, 1891 Wash. LEXIS 32

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 7, 1891

DocketNo. 104

StatusPublished

Cited by23 cases

This text of 26 P. 253 (Clark v. Tacoma Building & Savings Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Tacoma Building & Savings Ass'n, 26 P. 253, 2 Wash. 203, 1891 Wash. LEXIS 32 (Wash. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Dunbar, J.

— This cause was brought here on substantially the same allegation of error, and involves the same questions raised and discussed in the case of Reed v. Association, ante, p. 198; and for the reasons assigned in the opinion in that case the judgment in this case will be reversed, and the case remanded for a new trial in accordance therewith, with leave to amend pleadings.

Hoyt and Bcott, JJ., concur. Anders, C. J., concurs in the result. Stiles, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunbar, J.

— This cause was brought here on substantially the same allegation of error, and involves the same questions raised and discussed in the case of Reed v. Association, ante, p. 198; and for the reasons assigned in the opinion in that case the judgment in this case will be reversed, and the case remanded for a new trial in accordance therewith, with leave to amend pleadings.

Hoyt and Bcott, JJ., concur. Anders, C. J., concurs in the result. Stiles, J., disqualified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 P. 253, 2 Wash. 203, 1891 Wash. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-tacoma-building-savings-assn-wash-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack