Clark v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Clark v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.

11 A.D.2d 734, 204 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8992

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 734 (Clark v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co., 11 A.D.2d 734, 204 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8992 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting in intestate’s wrongful death, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered March 8, 1960, granting plaintiff’s motion to delete 20 of the 26 items specified in defendant’s demand for a bill or particulars. Order modified by striking from its ordering paragraph the items numbered 1, 2, 4, 9, 17 and 23. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the items above numbered were improperly deleted. The information with respect to them is necessary to enable the defendant to properly prepare for trial. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting in intestate’s wrongful death, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered March 8, 1960, granting plaintiff’s motion to delete 20 of the 26 items specified in defendant’s demand for a bill or particulars. Order modified by striking from its ordering paragraph the items numbered 1, 2, 4, 9, 17 and 23. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the items above numbered were improperly deleted. The information with respect to them is necessary to enable the defendant to properly prepare for trial. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 734, 204 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-staten-island-rapid-transit-railway-co-nyappdiv-1960.