Clark v. State

136 S.W.2d 228, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 755

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 Tex. Crim. 427 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 31, 1940·No. No. 20796·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for theft of cattle; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills óf exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for theft of cattle; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills óf exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Clark v. State, 136 S.W.2d 228, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 755 (Tex. 1940).

Pincite

136 S.W.2d 228 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.