Clark v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Clark v. State

1930 OK CR 135, 287 P. 1062, 47 Okla. Crim. 36, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 327

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 29, 1930

DocketNo. A-7288.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 135 (Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. State, 1930 OK CR 135, 287 P. 1062, 47 Okla. Crim. 36, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 327 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

- The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $200 and to imprisonment for a term of 30 days in the county jail.

Judgment was rendered in October, 1928, and the appeal was lodged in this court in February, 1929. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. The evidence for the state discloses that, at the time charged, officers with a search warrant searched the residence of defendant and discovered a gallon and a half of whisky. Defendant admitted the possession of the whisky, and stated that he had the whisky for his own use. The quantity was prima facie evidence of an intent to violate the law sufficient to carry the case to- the jury. No material error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

- The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $200 and to imprisonment for a term of 30 days in the county jail.

Judgment was rendered in October, 1928, and the appeal was lodged in this court in February, 1929. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. The evidence for the state discloses that, at the time charged, officers with a search warrant searched the residence of defendant and discovered a gallon and a half of whisky. Defendant admitted the possession of the whisky, and stated that he had the whisky for his own use. The quantity was prima facie evidence of an intent to violate the law sufficient to carry the case to- the jury. No material error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 135, 287 P. 1062, 47 Okla. Crim. 36, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.