Clark v. State

1919 OK CR 38, 177 P. 549, 15 Okla. Crim. 673, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 25
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 11, 1919
DocketNo. A-2808.
StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 38 (Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. State, 1919 OK CR 38, 177 P. 549, 15 Okla. Crim. 673, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 25 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Carter place in Wirt, Carter county, with the felonious intention and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $50.

This was a prosecution under section 4, c. 26, Session Laws 1913. Under the authority of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, holding said provision of the statute unconstitutional1 and void, the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 38, 177 P. 549, 15 Okla. Crim. 673, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.