Clark v. State

150 S.E. 651, 40 Ga. App. 505, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 611
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Ga. App. 384
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 12, 1929·No. 19995·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains the general grounds only. There is some evidence to support the verdict, and “whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 510 (94 S. E. 618).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 150 S.E. 651, 40 Ga. App. 505, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 611 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

150 S.E. 651 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradham v. State
94 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)