Clark v. State

102 S.E. 914, 25 Ga. App. 237, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 705
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1920·No. 11229·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

(After stating the foregoing faetSi)

1. “Ordinarily, when a month is referred to, it will be understood to be of the current year, unless from the connection it [239] appear that another is intended.” Tipton v. State, 119. Ga. 304 (2) (46 S. E. 436). See also Plair v. State, 23 Ga. App. 574 (99 S. E. 61), and cit.

3. All the evidence showing that the offense was committed some time during the year 1919 and prior to the finding of the indictment, it was not error harmful to the accused for the judge to charge the jury that they would be authorized *to convict the defendant if they found that the offense was committed at any time after the 38th of March, 1917. See Plair v. State, supra, and cit.

3. There was sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and the court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 102 S.E. 914, 25 Ga. App. 237, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 705 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

102 S.E. 914 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hathorne
387 A.2d 9 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1978)
Johnson v. Board of Supervisors
238 N.W. 66 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1931)