Clark v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Clark v. State

95 S.E. 529, 22 Ga. App. 125

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 2, 1918

Docket9508

StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 529 (Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. State, 95 S.E. 529, 22 Ga. App. 125 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Brotles, P. J.

The evidence in this case, though circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis than that of the guilt of the accused. Therefore the verdict finding him guilty of cow-[126]*126stealing, which has the approval of the trial judge, will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.

Decided April 2, 1918.

Indictment for larceny of cow; from Mitchell superior court— Judge Harrell. August 22, 1917.

Johnson & Warren, for plaintiff in error. B. 0. Bell, solicitor-general, F. A. Hooper, contra. Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brotles, P. J.

The evidence in this case, though circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis than that of the guilt of the accused. Therefore the verdict finding him guilty of cow-[126]*126stealing, which has the approval of the trial judge, will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.

Decided April 2, 1918.

Indictment for larceny of cow; from Mitchell superior court— Judge Harrell. August 22, 1917.

Johnson & Warren, for plaintiff in error. B. 0. Bell, solicitor-general, F. A. Hooper, contra. Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 S.E. 529, 22 Ga. App. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-state-gactapp-1918.