Clark v. State

201 So. 3d 799, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14947
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 5, 2016·No. No. 4D14-4793·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm this Anders1 appeal of the trial court’s disposition of appellant’s violation of probation proceeding, but remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Brown v. State, 82 So.3d 910 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Rey v. State, 904 So.2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), Riley v. State, 884 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). We recognize that the judge specified those conditions on the record, but a written order is required to incorporate those findings.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

WARNER, GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 201 So. 3d 799, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14947 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

201 So. 3d 799 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joseph v. State
243 So. 3d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
JEAN ERNST JOSEPH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
KENNETH WHITTAKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
223 So. 3d 270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)