Clark v. State
811 So. 2d 765, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2371, 2002 WL 342100
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 746 So. 2d 1237 →
Opinion
This case is affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a motion that includes the information and the oath required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure [766]*7663.850(c) no later than thirty (30) days from the issuance of the mandate. Thereafter, the parties shall proceed in accordance with Franklin v. State, 645 So.2d 166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. State, 811 So. 2d 765, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2371, 2002 WL 342100 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
811 So. 2d 765 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Franklin v. State
645 So. 2d 166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)