Clark v. State

787 So. 2d 196, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6681, 2001 WL 513888
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 746 So. 2d 1237
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 2001·No. No. 2D00-4038·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darron Clark appeals the denial of his motion to correct sentence filed pursuant [197]*197to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Clark challenges his sentences in circuit court case number 97-9676, for the offenses of burglary and two counts of dealing in stolen property, based on the supreme court’s decision in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000) (declaring unconstitutional amendments to the sentencing guidelines by chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida). The trial court denied the motion based on its finding that the offense in case number 97-9676, grand theft of a motor vehicle, occurred outside of the window for Heggs relief. The attachments to the trial court’s order support its determination. We suspect that Clark used the wrong case number on his motion.

Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Clark’s motion to correct sentence in case number 97-9676 without prejudice to any right he might have to file a proper motion in the correct case number.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, A.C.J., and GREEN and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 787 So. 2d 196, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6681, 2001 WL 513888 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

787 So. 2d 196 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)