Clark v. State

779 So. 2d 606, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2084, 2001 WL 194042
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 2001·No. No. 2D99-4368·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

The trial court erred in denying Chan-tay Clark’s motion for rehearing of the order denying her petition for writ of ha-beas corpus. In her motion for rehearing, Clark correctly asserted that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear her petition because she filed it in the wrong circuit. A petition for writ of habeas corpus must be filed in the circuit in which the petitioner is detained. § 79.09, Fla. Stat. (1997); Savage v. State, 662 So.2d 750 (Fla. 4th DCA1995).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court vacate its order denying Clark’s petition and transfer the petition to the proper circuit.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

FULMER, A.C.J., and DAVIS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 779 So. 2d 606, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2084, 2001 WL 194042 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

779 So. 2d 606 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spencer v. Florida Parole Commission
874 So. 2d 718 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)