Clark v. State
707 So. 2d 342, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12708, 1997 WL 716583
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1997·No. No. 96-02353·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant challenges his resentencing following this court’s mandate. Of the fourteen issues raised, only issue thirteen, regarding credit for time served, has merit. The state concedes that the 723 days’ credit appellant received cannot be accurate since the record indicates that appellant spent 792 days in the Pinellas County Jail.
We therefore affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand once again to the trial court for a determination of the correct amount of credit to be awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. State, 707 So. 2d 342, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12708, 1997 WL 716583 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
707 So. 2d 342 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. State
858 So. 2d 1122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)