Clark v. State

551 So. 2d 585, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2558, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6116, 1989 WL 130680
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1989·No. No. 89-00138·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Bennett v. State, 546 So.2d 1192 (Fla.2d DCA 1989) (Campbell, C.J., specially concurring); Blankenship v. State, 545 So.2d 908 (Fla.2d DCA 1989) (Hall, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part); State v. Burch, 545 So.2d 279 (Fla.4th DCA 1989).

As in Bennett and Blankenship, we determine the issue of whether chapter 87-243, Laws of Florida, violates Article III, Section 6 of the Florida Constitution to be of great public importance and certify the following question to the supreme court:

DOES SECTION 893.13(l)(e), FLORIDA STATUTES (1987) VIOLATE THE ONE SUBJECT REQUIREMENT OF ARTICLE III, SECTION 6 OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
CAMPBELL, C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 551 So. 2d 585, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2558, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6116, 1989 WL 130680 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

551 So. 2d 585 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCallister v. State
557 So. 2d 62 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Keegan v. State
553 So. 2d 797 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Williams v. Shuler
551 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)