Clark v. State

163 So. 924, 121 Fla. 355, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1584
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 Fla. 310
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 2, 1935·Published

Opinion

Buford, J.

In this case writ of error brings for review a judgment of conviction of plaintiff in error of murder in the first degree. The verdict was without recommendation to mercy.

The only question presented for our consideration is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to sustain a judgment of murder in the first degree.

It is contended that there is not sufficient evidence of premeditated design to effect death to establish that element of the offense.

We have considered the testimony as presented in the record and find it amply sufficient to warrant the jury in reaching the conclusion indicated by the judgment.

*356 Therefore, the judgment should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 163 So. 924, 121 Fla. 355, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1584 (Fla. 1935).

163 So. 924 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.