Clark v. State

98 So. 332, 86 Fla. 478
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 21, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence as to the guilt of the accused is circumstantial, and is of such a nature that a new trial should be granted.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J'. J., concur.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 98 So. 332, 86 Fla. 478 (Fla. 1923).

98 So. 332 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Luke
24 So. 2d 310 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)