Clark v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Clark v. State

74 S.W.3d 215, 348 Ark. 782, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 300

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 16, 2002

Docket02-430

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 S.W.3d 215 (Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. State, 74 S.W.3d 215, 348 Ark. 782, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 300 (Ark. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Jeremiah Clark, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Althea E. Hadden, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant Jeremiah Clark, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Althea E. Hadden, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 S.W.3d 215, 348 Ark. 782, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-state-ark-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack