Clark v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Clark v. State

106 So. 872, 21 Ala. App. 207, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 20

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 12, 1926

Docket5 Div. 548.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 106 So. 872 (Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. State, 106 So. 872, 21 Ala. App. 207, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 20 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Thére were two counts in the indictment which the grand jury preferred against this appellant. Count 1, in proper form and substance, charged him with distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol, etc. Count 2 charged the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors or beverages.

*208 Demurrers were interposed to count 2, but were overruled, and properly so. This court has many times held that a count of this character was good.

Upon conviction he was sentenced to serve an indeterminate sentence in the penitentiary of from three to four years. Judgment was pronounced and entered accordingly.

Let the judgment appealed from stand affirmed, as there is no error upon the record, and upon the record proper this appeal is predicated. There is no bill of exceptions.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI