Clark v. State

54 So. 431, 170 Ala. 101, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 21
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided February 9, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ANDERSON, J.-

The defendant was indicted for living in adultery with one “Bass Clark,” a woman, and the fact that the said “Bass” was pregnant at the time of the trial was a circumstance, corroborating the state’s theory that the defendant had illicit intercourse with her.

This being the only exception disclosed by the record, the judgment of the county court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and Sayre and Somervill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 54 So. 431, 170 Ala. 101, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 21 (Ala. 1911).

54 So. 431 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reinhardt v. State
164 N.W. 654 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1917)