Clark v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

306 F. App'x 796
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 13, 2009
DocketNo. 08-1531
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 306 F. App'x 796 (Clark v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 306 F. App'x 796 (3d Cir. 2009).

Opinion

OPINION

MCKEE, Circuit Judge.

Claude Clark appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Agency (“SEPTA”) and against him on the claim he brought under the Americans with Disability Act, the Rehabilitation Act and Pennsylvania Human Relations Act.

Since we write primarily for the parties who are familiar with the background of this case, we need not repeat the factual or procedural history. We have reviewed Judge Diamond’s thoughtful and careful Memorandum, dated January 24, 2008, 2008 WL 219223, in which the district court explains why defendant is entitled to summary judgment and why plaintiff is not. We can add little to the district court’s analysis and will therefore affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in that Memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 F. App'x 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-southeastern-pennsylvania-transportation-authority-ca3-2009.