Clark v. Smith, Guardian

68 S.W. 532, 29 Tex. Civ. App. 363, 1902 Tex. App. LEXIS 314
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 10, 1902·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

The court erred in holding judgment of the Justice Court not to be final, and in dismissing the appeal on that ground, because the aggregate amount of appellee’s counterclaim exceeded $200 and was not therefore within the jurisdiction of the Justice Court, notwithstanding his attempt to offset appellant’s *364 claim with enough of the counterclaim to reduce the amount for which appellee sought judgment and execution below $200. Gimbel v. Gomprecht, 35 S. W. Rep., 470; Cain v. Culbreath, 35 S. W. Rep., 809; Miller v. Newbaur, 61 S. W. Rep., 974. The Justice Court judgment denied appellant any recovery, and as it thus disposed of the only issue of which that court had jurisdiction it was appealable, though it took no notice of the counterclaim.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Smith, Guardian, 68 S.W. 532, 29 Tex. Civ. App. 363, 1902 Tex. App. LEXIS 314 (Tex. Ct. App. 1902).

68 S.W. 532 (Clark v. Smith, Guardian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manly v. Citizens Nat. Bank in Abilene
110 S.W.2d 993 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Kirby Lumber Co. v. Chambers
95 S.W. 607 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1906)