Clark v. Slusmeyer

200 F.2d 559
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 18, 1952
Docket11525_1
StatusPublished

This text of 200 F.2d 559 (Clark v. Slusmeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Slusmeyer, 200 F.2d 559 (6th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

200 F.2d 559

Mrs. Jessie CLARK, Executrix of the Estate of Mrs. Lillie
Slusmeyer, and Administratrix of CTA De Bonis Non
of the Estate of Herman H. Slusmeyer, Appellant,
v.
Louis SLUSMEYER, Appellee.

No. 11525.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 18, 1952.

Raymond C. Schultz and Francis T. Goheen, Paducah, Ky., and T. Robert Acklen, Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.

Richard R. Bryan and E. P. James, Paducah, Ky., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, McAllister, and Miller, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the judgment of the district court, D.C., 99 F.Supp. 484, is sustained by substantial evidence, and no prejudicial error appearing on the trial of the case, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment be and is hereby affirmed, in accordance with the findings of fact, the order and additional findings of fact and the conclusions of law of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slusmeyer v. Slusmeyer
99 F. Supp. 484 (W.D. Kentucky, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 F.2d 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-slusmeyer-ca6-1952.