Clark v. Slusmeyer

200 F.2d 559
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 18, 1952·No. No. 11525·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the judgment of the district court, D.C., 99 F. Supp. 484, is sustained by substantial evidence, and no- prejudicial error appearing on the trial of the case, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment be and is hereby affirmed, in accordance with the findings of fact, the order and additional findings of fact and the conclusions of law of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Slusmeyer, 200 F.2d 559 (6th Cir. 1952).

200 F.2d 559 (Clark v. Slusmeyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slusmeyer v. Slusmeyer
99 F. Supp. 484 (W.D. Kentucky, 1951)