Clark v. Sheperd

California Court of Appeal

Clark v. Sheperd

189 P. 725, 46 Cal. App. 677, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 731

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 22, 1920

DocketCiv. No. 3306.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 P. 725 (Clark v. Sheperd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Sheperd, 189 P. 725, 46 Cal. App. 677, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 731 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

[1] This is an application for a writ ofmandamus. The application is based upon private rights only. The matters to be litigated are not publici juris. Nor does it appear that some peculiar emergency or exigency exists such as would justify the issuance of the writ by this court in the first instance. The petition shows no sufficient reason why the application should not have been made to the superior court, and the application for the writ is therefore denied. *Page 678

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1] This is an application for a writ ofmandamus. The application is based upon private rights only. The matters to be litigated are not publici juris. Nor does it appear that some peculiar emergency or exigency exists such as would justify the issuance of the writ by this court in the first instance. The petition shows no sufficient reason why the application should not have been made to the superior court, and the application for the writ is therefore denied. *Page 678

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 P. 725, 46 Cal. App. 677, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-sheperd-calctapp-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack