Clark v. Sheperd

California Court of Appeal

Clark v. Sheperd

189 P. 725, 46 Cal. App. 677, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 731

California Court of Appeal·Decided March 22, 1920·No. Civ. No. 3306.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[1] This is an application for a writ ofmandamus. The application is based upon private rights only. The matters to be litigated are not publici juris. Nor does it appear that some peculiar emergency or exigency exists such as would justify the issuance of the writ by this court in the first instance. The petition shows no sufficient reason why the application should not have been made to the superior court, and the application for the writ is therefore denied. *Page 678

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1] This is an application for a writ ofmandamus. The application is based upon private rights only. The matters to be litigated are not publici juris. Nor does it appear that some peculiar emergency or exigency exists such as would justify the issuance of the writ by this court in the first instance. The petition shows no sufficient reason why the application should not have been made to the superior court, and the application for the writ is therefore denied. *Page 678

Clark v. Sheperd, 189 P. 725, 46 Cal. App. 677, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 731 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

189 P. 725 (Clark v. Sheperd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related