Clark v. SCHREIMANN

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clark v. SCHREIMANN

328 S.W.3d 815, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1798, 2010 WL 5393505

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 30, 2010·No. WD 72497·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

James Clark appeals from the trial court’s judgment declaring that Clark is not ineligible for parole, but declining to calculate Clark’s eligibility date for parole. Clark contends that “the trial court erred in entering summary judgment in favor of the Respondents because Respondents vio *816 lated section 217.690.4 and section 558.019 in calculating the minimum prison term” that Clark must serve before he is eligible for parole consideration. Because the trial court afforded Clark the relief he requested in his petition for declaratory judgment, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

James Clark appeals from the trial court’s judgment declaring that Clark is not ineligible for parole, but declining to calculate Clark’s eligibility date for parole. Clark contends that “the trial court erred in entering summary judgment in favor of the Respondents because Respondents vio *816 lated section 217.690.4 and section 558.019 in calculating the minimum prison term” that Clark must serve before he is eligible for parole consideration. Because the trial court afforded Clark the relief he requested in his petition for declaratory judgment, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Clark v. SCHREIMANN, 328 S.W.3d 815, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1798, 2010 WL 5393505 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

328 S.W.3d 815 (Clark v. SCHREIMANN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.