Clark v. Schooner New Hampshire

E.D. Michigan

Clark v. Schooner New Hampshire

1 How. N.P. 37

DecidedJanuary 12, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. N.P. 37 (Clark v. Schooner New Hampshire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Schooner New Hampshire, 1 How. N.P. 37 (E.D. Mich. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court,

Brown, District Judge,

held that there were two contracts, one to carry and one to sell, the first a maritime contract; the other a land contract. That the vessel had completed the maritime contract when the goods were delivered at the port of Detroit. The contract to sell was with the Master alone, making him consignee ; and, being a land contract, in which the vessel was not concerned,, the court had no jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court,

Brown, District Judge,

held that there were two contracts, one to carry and one to sell, the first a maritime contract; the other a land contract. That the vessel had completed the maritime contract when the goods were delivered at the port of Detroit. The contract to sell was with the Master alone, making him consignee ; and, being a land contract, in which the vessel was not concerned,, the court had no jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 How. N.P. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-schooner-new-hampshire-mied-1880.