Clark v. Scammon

62 Me. 47
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 Me. 47 (Clark v. Scammon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Scammon, 62 Me. 47 (Me. 1873).

Opinion

Appleton, C. J.

This is an action of trespass quare clausum. The defendants justify their right to enter and cut timber under a deed from William Freeman to Tyler Scammon d¿ al. dated Sept. 2,1867, which conveys to the grantees therein named “a certain tract or parcel of land situated in said Franklin, containing three hundred and twenty acres, more or less, being a lot reserved by the State of Massachusetts for future disposition, and sold and conveyed by said State to William Emerson, Abner Coburn and Isaac Farrar, and by said Emerson, Coburn & Farrar to me (said Freeman), reference being had to the deeds thereof given by Geo. W. Coffin, land agent of said State, to said Emerson, Co-burn and Farrar, and the deed of said Emerson, Coburn and Farrar to said Freeman. It being also the same lot of land, -set of and run off by John Black, Esq., agent of the Bingham Proprietors and Heirs for and as the public lot reserved by Massachusetts as aforesaid.”

The grantees can hold no more land than is conveyed to them. The two descriptions in the deed refer to the same identical lot of land. No evidence has been offered to show any variance between the two descriptions ; one referring to the title acquired by the grantor, and the other to the survey of Black. The defendants show no title to any land outside of Black’s survey, nor is there any reason apparent upon the papers before us why they should claim more. Default to stand.

Cutting, Walton, Dickerson, Barrows and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J. J. White Lumber Co. v. McComb City Turpentine Co.
71 So. 5 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Me. 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-scammon-me-1873.