Clark v. Saralakes Estates

482 So. 2d 387, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2303, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16172
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 8, 1985·No. No. BG-43·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant appeals the deputy commissioner’s denial of appellant’s motion for [388] attorney’s fees to be paid by appellees employer/carrier pursuant to section 440.-34(3)(a) or (c), Florida Statutes. We reverse.

The record shows that appellant prevailed in proceedings in which he sought medical benefits only and at the time he sought those benefits, he had not filed and was not entitled to file a claim for other benefits. Consequently, he is entitled to recover from appellees a reasonable attorney’s fee pursuant to section 440.34(3)(a), Florida Statutes.

As a result of the above holding, we need not reach the question of whether appellant is entitled to recover an attorney’s fee from appellees pursuant to section 440.34(3)(c).

REVERSED and REMANDED to the deputy commissioner for a determination of a reasonable attorney’s fee.

SHIVERS and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Saralakes Estates, 482 So. 2d 387, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2303, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16172 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

482 So. 2d 387 (Clark v. Saralakes Estates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Westinghouse Electric v. Widlan
623 So. 2d 511 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)