Clark v. Saralakes Estates
This text of 482 So. 2d 387 (Clark v. Saralakes Estates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals the deputy commissioner’s denial of appellant’s motion for [388]*388attorney’s fees to be paid by appellees employer/carrier pursuant to section 440.-34(3)(a) or (c), Florida Statutes. We reverse.
The record shows that appellant prevailed in proceedings in which he sought medical benefits only and at the time he sought those benefits, he had not filed and was not entitled to file a claim for other benefits. Consequently, he is entitled to recover from appellees a reasonable attorney’s fee pursuant to section 440.34(3)(a), Florida Statutes.
As a result of the above holding, we need not reach the question of whether appellant is entitled to recover an attorney’s fee from appellees pursuant to section 440.34(3)(c).
REVERSED and REMANDED to the deputy commissioner for a determination of a reasonable attorney’s fee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
482 So. 2d 387, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2303, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-saralakes-estates-fladistctapp-1985.