Clark v. Samuel

1 Root 486
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 15, 1793
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 1 Root 486 (Clark v. Samuel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Samuel, 1 Root 486 (Colo. 1793).

Opinion

Judgment • — ■ That the plea in abatement is sufficient. In tbis case, service upon botb of tbe defendants is necessary; and no service having been made upon either until after Wil-' bands death, the action cannot be said to' have been commenced in bis lifetime, although tbe writ was prayed out before; and not having been commenced in tbe life of said William, it doth not survive against tbe surviving defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valley Cable Vision, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
392 A.2d 485 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1978)
Glebus v. Fillmore
104 F. Supp. 902 (D. Connecticut, 1952)
Spinning v. Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co.
2 Disney (Ohio) 336 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1858)
Gates v. Bushnell
9 Conn. 538 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1833)
Spalding v. Butts
6 Conn. 28 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1825)
Jencks v. Phelps
4 Conn. 149 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1822)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-samuel-conn-1793.