Clark v. Rosenwald

247 P. 306, 31 N.M. 443
New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided December 23, 1925·No. Nos. 2934, 2935.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Plaintiff in error, in his brief on the motion for rehearing, calls attention to the fact, which we had overlooked, that at the oral argument he announced that he was willing to abandon the writ of error, No. 2934, which goes to the final judgment. In the reply brief defendants in error, in view of this, ask that an order be entered dismissing that writ. Such order will therefore be entered.

In view of the fact that confusion has crept into the discussion, by reason of there having been two writs *Page 445 of error from separate judgments, we deem a rehearing and reconsideration desirable upon the motion to dismiss the writ of error in No. 2935. The motion for rehearing will therefore be granted.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Rosenwald, 247 P. 306, 31 N.M. 443 (N.M. 1925).

247 P. 306 (Clark v. Rosenwald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tom Fields, Ltd. v. Tigner
301 P.2d 322 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1956)
State Ex Rel. Lebeck v. Chavez
113 P.2d 179 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1941)
BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McComb
60 F.2d 218 (Tenth Circuit, 1932)
Kerr v. Southwest Flourite Co.
294 P. 324 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1930)
Armijo v. Pettit
286 P. 827 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1930)