Clark v. . Riddle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Clark v. . Riddle

24 S.E. 492, 118 N.C. 692

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 5, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 S.E. 492 (Clark v. . Riddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. . Riddle, 24 S.E. 492, 118 N.C. 692 (N.C. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Avery, J.:

In the exercise of the discretionary power vested in the Court, it is ordered that a new trial be granted on account of newly discovered evidence. Such orders are made in this Court, as in the court below, for no other reason than that we think the ends of justice will be best subserved by taking that course, and are never therefore to be treated as precedents. Sledge v. Elliott, 116 N. C., 112; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 347.

New Trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Avery, J.:

In the exercise of the discretionary power vested in the Court, it is ordered that a new trial be granted on account of newly discovered evidence. Such orders are made in this Court, as in the court below, for no other reason than that we think the ends of justice will be best subserved by taking that course, and are never therefore to be treated as precedents. Sledge v. Elliott, 116 N. C., 112; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 347.

New Trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 S.E. 492, 118 N.C. 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-riddle-nc-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack