Clark v. . Riddle

24 S.E. 492, 118 N.C. 692
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1896·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Avery, J.:

In the exercise of the discretionary power vested in the Court, it is ordered that a new trial be granted on account of newly discovered evidence. Such orders are made in this Court, as in the court below, for no other reason than that we think the ends of justice will be best subserved by taking that course, and are never therefore to be treated as precedents. Sledge v. Elliott, 116 N. C., 112; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 347.

New Trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. . Riddle, 24 S.E. 492, 118 N.C. 692 (N.C. 1896).

24 S.E. 492 (Clark v. . Riddle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herndon v. North Carolina Railroad
28 S.E. 144 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)