Clark v. Rice

6 Vt. 33
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided January 15, 1834·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was pronounced by

Mattocks, J.

— We do not think it advisable to adopt the English practice of taxing cost both ways, where some of the issues are so found. The practice here has been otherwise, and it would be likely to occasion some troublesome contention whether the counts were for different causes of action, or whether they were synonymous. And although sometimes plaintiff joins a forlorn claim with a just one, yet the defendant can generally obviate this difficulty by a tender or bringing the money into court. But in this case, as the defendant tendered the plaintiff judgment for all that was due, let the plaintiff take all his cost as of a judgment, but no cost for the trial by jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Rice, 6 Vt. 33 (Vt. 1834).

6 Vt. 33 (Clark v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edgerton v. Smith
35 Vt. 573 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1863)
Hart v. Skinner
16 Vt. 138 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1844)