Clark v. Rice
This text of 6 Vt. 33 (Clark v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was pronounced by
— We do not think it advisable to adopt the English practice of taxing cost both ways, where some of the issues are so found. The practice here has been otherwise, and it would be likely to occasion some troublesome contention whether the counts were for different causes of action, or whether they were synonymous. And although sometimes plaintiff joins a forlorn claim with a just one, yet the defendant can generally obviate this difficulty by a tender or bringing the money into court. But in this case, as the defendant tendered the plaintiff judgment for all that was due, let the plaintiff take all his cost as of a judgment, but no cost for the trial by jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Vt. 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-rice-vt-1834.