Clark v. Reynolds

New York Court of Appeals

Clark v. Reynolds

33 N.E.2d 545, 285 N.Y. 611, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1628

DecidedMarch 4, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 33 N.E.2d 545 (Clark v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Reynolds, 33 N.E.2d 545, 285 N.Y. 611, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1628 (N.Y. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion denied. The moving papers do not indicate that the plaintiff moved for a direction of a verdict or that the trial court erred in submitting questions of fact to the jury. Upon an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division reversing a judgment on the facts and granting a new trial, this court may consider only whether “ as matter of law on the evidence the plaintiff was entitled to judgment.” (Rockowitz C. & B. Corp. v. Madame X Co., 248 N. Y. 272.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion denied. The moving papers do not indicate that the plaintiff moved for a direction of a verdict or that the trial court erred in submitting questions of fact to the jury. Upon an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division reversing a judgment on the facts and granting a new trial, this court may consider only whether “ as matter of law on the evidence the plaintiff was entitled to judgment.” (Rockowitz C. & B. Corp. v. Madame X Co., 248 N. Y. 272.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 N.E.2d 545, 285 N.Y. 611, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-reynolds-ny-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack