Clark v. Quackenboss

Illinois Supreme Court

Clark v. Quackenboss

28 Ill. 112

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1862

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 28 Ill. 112 (Clark v. Quackenboss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Quackenboss, 28 Ill. 112 (Ill. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This rule must be denied. The security for costs, given in the Circuit Court, was limited to the costs of that court; there the appellees were successful, and they have been brought to this court against their will. We see no objection to proceedings by fee-bill on the part of the circuit clerk to collect his costs from the security; notwithstanding the judgment rendered in that court has been reversed.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This rule must be denied. The security for costs, given in the Circuit Court, was limited to the costs of that court; there the appellees were successful, and they have been brought to this court against their will. We see no objection to proceedings by fee-bill on the part of the circuit clerk to collect his costs from the security; notwithstanding the judgment rendered in that court has been reversed.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Ill. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-quackenboss-ill-1862.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack