Clark v. Quackenboss

Illinois Supreme Court

Clark v. Quackenboss

28 Ill. 112

Illinois Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1862·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This rule must be denied. The security for costs, given in the Circuit Court, was limited to the costs of that court; there the appellees were successful, and they have been brought to this court against their will. We see no objection to proceedings by fee-bill on the part of the circuit clerk to collect his costs from the security; notwithstanding the judgment rendered in that court has been reversed.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This rule must be denied. The security for costs, given in the Circuit Court, was limited to the costs of that court; there the appellees were successful, and they have been brought to this court against their will. We see no objection to proceedings by fee-bill on the part of the circuit clerk to collect his costs from the security; notwithstanding the judgment rendered in that court has been reversed.

Motion denied.

Clark v. Quackenboss, 28 Ill. 112 (Ill. 1862).

Pincite

28 Ill. 112 (Clark v. Quackenboss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related