Clark v. Pyramid Masonry Contractors

Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided February 12, 2014·No. 2014-UP-058·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

James Clark, Jr., Respondent, v.

Pyramid Masonry Contractors Inc., and Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Appellants.

Appellate Case No. 2012-212898

Appeal From Fairfield County Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-058 Heard January 9, 2014 – Filed February 12, 2014

DISMISSED

J. Kevin Couch, Willson Jones Carter & Baxley, P.A., of Greenville, for Appellants.

Gary Walton Popwell, Jr., Lee Eadon Isgett & Popwell, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Pyramid Masonry, Inc. and Hartford Fire Insurance Company appeal the order of the trial judge affirming the Workers' Compensation

Commission's granting of benefits to James Clark, Jr. We dismiss pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:

As to interlocutory appeal: Bone v. U.S. Food Serv., 404 S.C. 67, 76, 744 S.E.2d 552, 557 (2013) (stating that an order of the circuit court remanding a case for additional proceedings before an administrative agency is not directly appealable).

DISMISSED. HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Pyramid Masonry Contractors, (S.C. Ct. App. 2014).

Clark v. Pyramid Masonry Contractors (Clark v. Pyramid Masonry Contractors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bone v. U.S. Food Service
744 S.E.2d 552 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2013)