Clark v. Pyramid Masonry Contractors
This text of Clark v. Pyramid Masonry Contractors (Clark v. Pyramid Masonry Contractors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
James Clark, Jr., Respondent,
v.
Pyramid Masonry Contractors Inc., and Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Appellants.
Appellate Case No. 2012-212898
Appeal From Fairfield County Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-058 Heard January 9, 2014 – Filed February 12, 2014
DISMISSED
J. Kevin Couch, Willson Jones Carter & Baxley, P.A., of Greenville, for Appellants.
Gary Walton Popwell, Jr., Lee Eadon Isgett & Popwell, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Pyramid Masonry, Inc. and Hartford Fire Insurance Company appeal the order of the trial judge affirming the Workers' Compensation Commission's granting of benefits to James Clark, Jr. We dismiss pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:
As to interlocutory appeal: Bone v. U.S. Food Serv., 404 S.C. 67, 76, 744 S.E.2d 552, 557 (2013) (stating that an order of the circuit court remanding a case for additional proceedings before an administrative agency is not directly appealable).
DISMISSED.
HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clark v. Pyramid Masonry Contractors, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-pyramid-masonry-contractors-scctapp-2014.