Clark v. Pratt

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Clark v. Pratt

47 Me. 55

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1859·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Davis, J.

The demandants claim under a recorded deed, dated Sept. 16th, 1856. The proof of authority on the part of Guild to execute that deed, is sufficient, as against a stran■ger. The tenants have no interest in the mortgage assigned-to Cram. And the evidence fails to show that the collector of taxes, under whose deeds they claim, proceeded according to statute in making the sales. Exceptions overruled.

Tenney, C. J., and Appleton, Cutting, May and Kent, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Davis, J.

The demandants claim under a recorded deed, dated Sept. 16th, 1856. The proof of authority on the part of Guild to execute that deed, is sufficient, as against a stran■ger. The tenants have no interest in the mortgage assigned-to Cram. And the evidence fails to show that the collector of taxes, under whose deeds they claim, proceeded according to statute in making the sales. Exceptions overruled.

Tenney, C. J., and Appleton, Cutting, May and Kent, JJ., concurred.

Clark v. Pratt, 47 Me. 55 (Me. 1859).

Pincite

47 Me. 55 (Clark v. Pratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related