Clark v. Phelps

6 Johns. Ch. 214, 1822 N.Y. LEXIS 179, 1822 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 44
New York Court of Chancery·Decided August 1, 1822·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor said, that the answer and the demurrer each went to the whole bill; and it is a settled rule in pleading, that a defendant cannot plead or answer, and demur to the same matter; the former will overrule the latter. It is inconsistent for a defendant to say, he ought not to answer to a bill; and yet to answer it fully. The rule appears in all the books that treat on the subject. (3 P. Wms. 80, 81. 2 Atk. 284. Cooler’s Tr. of Pl. 113. Beames' Plead. 40.) The demurrer was consequently overruled, and^the question of costs reserved.

Order accordingly. -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Phelps, 6 Johns. Ch. 214, 1822 N.Y. LEXIS 179, 1822 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 44 (N.Y. 1822).

6 Johns. Ch. 214 (Clark v. Phelps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDevitt v. Connell
63 A. 504 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1906)
Wade v. Pulsifer
54 Vt. 45 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1881)
Fisher v. Scholte
30 Iowa 221 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1870)
Pieri v. Mayor of Shieldsboro
42 Miss. 493 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1869)