Clark v. Otto Weiss Alfalfa Stock Food Co.
122 P. 895, 86 Kan. 982, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 430
Opinion
It was conceded at the oral presentation that the assignments of error upon which the decision depends call for a reconsideration of various' questions decided adversely to the appellant in the case of Caspar v. Lewin, 82 Kan. 604, 109 Pac. 657. After such reconsideration the court adheres to the [983]*983rules of law stated in the syllabus of the case cited. Those rules were properly applied'by the district court in all the matters complained of and its judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. Otto Weiss Alfalfa Stock Food Co., 122 P. 895, 86 Kan. 982, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 430 (kan 1912).
122 P. 895 (Clark v. Otto Weiss Alfalfa Stock Food Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Buchanan v. Blair
133 P. 709 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1913)